Nico Rosberg has never been shy when it comes to Lewis Hamilton, and his latest comments are no exception, writes Rant Sport’s Noah Ngcobo.
Speaking on the High Performance podcast, Rosberg claimed that Hamilton is “not currently performing at the level required to win a record eighth F1 championship,” adding that “the car is not good enough, and his level is not quite there yet.”
On the surface, it sounds measured. Rosberg even softened it by suggesting Hamilton will “win a race at least this year.”
But the core message is clear. He believes Hamilton is no longer operating at championship standard.
That is where the argument starts to fall apart. Because the reality of Hamilton’s Ferrari spell tells a very different story.
READ MORE: F1: Martin Brundle missed the point on Lewis Hamilton’s Ferrari move
Selective criticism disguised as insight
The numbers alone contradict the idea of decline. He currently sits just three points behind Charles Leclerc in the standings, with just as many podiums (two) already this season.
That is not a driver fading out, that is a driver immediately adapting to a new team environment while still delivering results under pressure.
Rosberg’s framing also ignores the most basic truth of modern Formula 1, performance is inseparable from machinery.
A driver’s “level” is not an isolated constant. It is shaped by strategy execution, reliability, upgrades, and yes, outright car competitiveness.
Reducing everything to a personal ceiling is convenient analysis, not complete analysis.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: F1 news: McLaren’s Canada strategy blunder, according to Oscar Piastri and Andrea Stella
The car narrative Rosberg overplays
Rosberg doubles down by claiming Ferrari’s SF-26 is “not good enough,” pointing to technical gaps and suggesting structural weaknesses are limiting Hamilton’s output.
But that argument cuts both ways. If the car is truly below the top benchmark, then no driver, regardless of legacy, is being judged on equal footing with a title-winning package.
In that context, using championship contention as the only metric becomes misleading. Hamilton is not in a dominant Mercedes era car anymore.
He is operating in a transitional Ferrari project, where margins are tight and development cycles matter more than raw reputation.
Even the idea that Hamilton’s “level is not quite there” ignores what the results actually show.
Two podiums in a short span, immediate competitiveness with his team-mate, and consistent points scoring are not a downturn. It is stability in a rebuilding phase.
Rosberg’s perspective is also shaped by history. Their rivalry is well documented, and that context inevitably colours interpretation.
When someone who beat a driver once evaluates them years later, the analysis rarely comes free of framing.
The truth is simpler. Hamilton is not failing to meet a mythical standard. He is extracting performance from a new system while Ferrari continues to evolve around him.
Rosberg’s verdict makes for a strong headline, but it does not match the full competitive picture.
READ NEXT: Real Madrid news: Presidential elections signal a new era for Los Blancos
